Pregnancy loss after frozen embryo transfer A comparison of three protocols

Frozen-embryo transfer in substituted cycles resulted in higher pregnancy rates but also increased pregnancy loss, leading to similar clinical pregnancy and delivery rates for the protocols studied.

Like 0 Comment

Authors

Candido Tomás, M.D., Ph.D., Birgit Alsbjerg, M.D., Hannu Martikainen, M.D., Ph.D., Peter Humaidan, M.D., D.M.Sc.

Vol 98, Issue 5, Pages 1165-1169

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the reproductive outcome of three protocols for frozen embryo transfer treatment.

Design:

Retrospective follow-up study.

Setting:

Two public clinics and one private clinic.

Patients:

Four thousand four hundred seventy frozen ET cycles between 2006 and 2010.

Interventions:

Thawing of embryos and embryo transfer.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

Pregnancy test rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and pregnancy loss rate.

Results:

The natural cycle followed by P (NC + P) was used in 26% of cycles, the natural cycle with hCG (NC + hCG) in 10%, and the substituted cycle with estrogen and P (E + P) in 64% of cycles. The rate of transfers after thawing was similar in all groups (87.2%, 73.9%, and 87.2%, respectively). There was a significantly higher positive pregnancy test rate in the E + P (34.3%) and NC + hCG (35.5%) cycles as compared with the NC + P cycles (26.7%). However, the clinical pregnancy rate was similar in all groups (27.7%, 29.1%, and 24.3%, respectively). Moreover, no differences were seen between groups regarding the live-birth rate (20.1%, 23.5%, and 20.7%, respectively). A logistic regression analysis showed that the type of protocol was the only predictor of pregnancy loss, while age, irregular cycles, endometrial thickness, number, and quality of embryos transferred did not correlate to pregnancy loss.

Conclusions:

A higher positive pregnancy test rate was obtained in E+P FET cycles in comparison to other protocols; however, due to an increased preclinical and clinical pregnancy loss, comparable clinical pregnancy and delivery rates are reported for the three protocols.

Read the full text at: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(12)01793-1/fulltext


Go to the profile of Fertility and Sterility

Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.

No comments yet.