VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1, P50-57, MARCH 01, 2021
Authors:
Rachel B. Mejia, D.O., Emily A. Capper, B.A., Karen M. Summers, M.P.H., Patrick Ten Eyck, Ph.D., Bradley J. Van Voorhis, M.D.
Abstract:
Objective
To compare the effects of initial elective single embryo transfer (ieSET) and initial double embryo transfer (iDET) strategies on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and perinatal outcomes after IVF.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) reporting clinics.
Patient(s)
49,333 patients with initial oocyte retrievals between January 2014 and December 2015.
Intervention(s)
None.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
The primary outcome was CLBR, defined as up to 1 live birth resulting from a retrieval cycle and linked transfer cycles. Secondary outcomes included cycles to pregnancy, multifetal delivery rate, infant birthweight, and perinatal mortality rate.
Result(s)
Compared to iDET, ieSET was associated with increased CLBR (74% vs. 57%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.26–1.38). When stratified by age, the same trend was seen in all age categories, with statistical significance for those <38 years of age. ieSET was associated with reduced multifetal delivery (8% vs. 34%; AOR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.12–0.14), increased birthweight (mean difference, 406 grams; 95% CI, 387–425), reduced preterm births (1.2% vs. 2.8%), and reduced perinatal mortality (0.5% vs. 1.2%). Compared with iDET, ieSET was associated with slightly more embryo transfer cycles (1.7 vs. 1.4 cycles; AOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.16–1.21) to achieve a pregnancy resulting in live birth.
Conclusion(s)
The association of ieSET with a higher CLBR and markedly improved perinatal outcomes outweigh the relatively minor increase in time to pregnancy, reinforcing the guidance for eSET in initial transfer cycles, particularly in younger patients with a good prognosis.
