Reproduction reimagined

Special Contribution

Like Comment
Related Content

Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 7–8


Eli Y. Adashi, M.D., M.S., I. Glenn Cohen, J.D.


Thomas Samuel Kuhn, Ph.D. (1922-1996), plausibly the leading philosopher of science of our time, maintained that science proceeds through periods of steady growth punctuated by emendational revolutions. His 1962 book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, one of the most quoted bodies of academic work of all time, maintains that the progress of science is not linear, let alone invariant (1). Rather, the progress of science is episodic, that is, marked by alternating periods of “normal” and “revolutionary” gains.

Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.