Do we need to separate initiation and growth to understand endometriosis?

Reflections
Do we need to separate initiation and growth to understand endometriosis?
Like

VOLUME 114, ISSUE 4, P766-767

Authors:

Philippe R. Koninckx, M.D., Ph.D., Dan C. Martin, M.D., Jacques Donnez, M.D., Ph.D. 

Abstract:

Reflections on "Epidermal growth factor promotes stromal cells migration and invasion via up-regulation of hyaluronate synthase 2 and hyaluronan in endometriosis" by Zhan et al.

Read the full text here. 

Please sign in or register for FREE

Your Fertility and Sterility Dialog login information is not the same as your ASRM or EES credentials. Users must create a separate account to comment or interact on the Dialog.

Go to the profile of Hazout Andre
about 2 years ago

I agree with everything that is mentioned in this reflection and I would like to stress the high probability of the epigenetic origin of endometriosis. The presence of endometriosis in the male and the fetus suggests that the epigenetic origin is well established, on the basis of numerous studies determining many candidate genes (CALD1, FN1, FASN, IL6, etc ...) The methylation status of these genes seems to be decisive for understanding the prognosis and the evolution of the endometriotic disease. These genes are accessible by the study of free DNA fragments in circulating blood and their methylation status, studied by our team (patent pending) has enabled us to establish not only early diagnosis but also a prognosis. as to the scalability of endometriosis foci. A therapeutic argument is at the end of validation and the results on pain and comfort of life seem promising