Prevalence consequence and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the Embryoscope time lapse video system

This study investigated the prevalence and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos observed via time-lapse monitoring. Embryos showing reverse cleavage were associated with compromised subsequent development and implantation potential.

Like Comment

Authors

Yanhe Liu, M.Sc., Vincent Chapple, M.B., B.S., F.R.A.N.Z.C.O.G., M.R.Med., Peter Roberts, Ph.D., Phillip Matson, Ph.D.

Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages 1295-1300

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the prevalence and potential causes of reverse cleavage (RC) by human early-cleavage embryos and its associations with embryonic development and implantation after transfer.

Design:

Clinical retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

Private fertility treatment center.

Patient(s):

A total of 126 consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment cycles, with 353 IVF and 436 ICSI embryos cultured in the Embryoscope until day 3.

Intervention(s):

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

Embryo assessment on day 3, incidence of abnormal division, embryo morphokinetic parameters, and fetal heart beat.

Result(s):

RC, referring to either blastomere fusion or failed cytokinesis, occurred up to three times per individual embryo in 27.4% of embryos during the first three cleavage cycles. A higher incidence was associated with GnRH antagonist cycles compared with agonist cycles (odds ratio [OR] 1.683), or with ICSI compared with IVF (OR 1.600). After ICSI, sperm progressive motility was associated with RC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.573). Compared with RC-negative embryos, a lower proportion of RC-positive embryos reached 6-cell stage or beyond by day 3 (47.7% vs. 71.7%), and were more likely to have multinucleation at the 4-cell stage (10.1% vs. 5.0%). Embryos showing RC had significantly poorer performance in both conventional grading and morphokinetic parameters, and they implanted less (0/22 vs. 29/131) than those not showing RC.

Conclusion(s):

RC significantly compromised embryo development, culminating in poor implantation potential. For each embryo, it can occur on more than one occasion at any stage during the first 3 days of culture. It is associated with factors affecting both oocyte and sperm.

Read the full text at: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(14)01862-7/fulltext


Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.

No comments yet.