Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis?

The biological efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation is comparable to fresh in vitro fertilization when live-birth rate is analyzed per mature oocyte retrieved.

Like Comment

Authors

Kara N. Goldman, M.D., Nicole L. Noyes, M.D., Jaime M. Knopman, M.D., Caroline McCaffrey, Ph.D., H.C.L.D., James A. Grifo, M.D., Ph.D.

Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 712-717, September 2013

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation (OC) and IVF using the metric “live births per mature oocyte retrieved.”

Design:

Retrospective analysis.

Setting:

University-based fertility center.

Patient(s):

Forty women who underwent OC with thaw attempt between 2004 and 2010; 25 autologous and 15 donor-oocyte treatments were included. One thousand nine hundred eight women underwent their first, fresh conventional IVF treatment between 2004 and 2010; 1,392 used autologous oocytes, and 516 used donor oocytes. Autologous and donor-oocyte cycles were analyzed separately. All oocytes were obtained from women Intervention(s):

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

Live-birth rate per mature oocyte retrieved (primary outcome), live-birth rate per ET, and blastocyst formation rate.

Result(s):

When OC/thaw cycles were compared with fresh IVF attempts, there was no significant difference in live-birth rate per mature oocyte retrieved (2.7% vs. 4.2%, respectively) or live-birth rate per ET (45.8% vs. 51.9%). Significantly more oocytes were harvested in the OC versus fresh IVF cycles (21 vs. 16); however, fewer blastocysts developed (3.9 vs. 6.3). Thus, we noted an age-independent approximate twofold decrease in blastocyst formation in the OC group.

Conclusion(s):

Our data suggest that while assisted reproductive technology remains an inefficient process, OC may be approaching fresh IVF when live birth is the primary consideration. However, OC may negatively impact the potential for blastocyst formation.

Read the full text at: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(13)00554-2/fulltext


Go to the profile of Fertility and Sterility

Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.

No comments yet.