Risk-sharing or refund programs in assisted reproduction: a committee opinion

This opinion of the ASRM Ethics Committee analyzes the ethical issues raised by assisted reproduction program fee structures in which patients pay more initially but receive a partial refund if treatment fails.

Like Comment

Authors

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 334-336, August 2013

Abstract

Risk-sharing fee structures in assisted reproduction programs charge patients a higher initial fee but provide a partial refund if treatment fails. This opinion of the ASRM Ethics Committee analyzes the ethical issues raised by these fee structures, including patient selection criteria, conflicts of interest, and patient-informed consent. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2004 (Fertil Steril 2004;82:S249–50).

Read the full text at: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(13)00334-8/fulltext


Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders.