Restoring fertility in women aged 40 years and older after tubal ligation: tubal anastomosis versus in vitro fertilization

Fertile Battle

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Published Mar 29, 2020

Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 735–742

Authors:

Jamie Peregrine, M.D., Peter G. McGovern, M.D., Paula C. Brady, M.D., Elizabeth S. Ginsburg, M.D., William Schlaff, M.D.

Abstract:

Pro Surgery: Restoring fertility in women aged 40 years and older after tubal ligation: Tubal anastomosis is the best approach

Pro IVF: Restoring fertility in women aged 40 years and older after tubal ligation: IVF is the best approach

Read the full text here.

Which is the best approach for restoring fertility in women aged 40 years and older after tubal ligation?

Surgery is the best approach

IVF is the best approach

Created with Poll Maker

Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders.

Restoring fertility in women aged 40 years and older after tubal ligation: tubal anastomosis versus in vitro fertilization

Share

Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 735–742

Authors:

Abstract:

Fertility and Sterility

You may also be interested in...

Should women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment or who are in the first trimester of pregnancy be vaccinated immediately against COVID-19

Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility fellowship programs: Does one size fit all?

Should couples with unexplained infertility have three to six cycles of intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation or in vitro fertilization as first-line treatment?

Utility of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for fertility preservation in women receiving chemotherapy: pros and cons