Comparing fertilization rates from intracytoplasmic sperm injection to conventional in vitro fertilization among women of advanced age with non−male factor infertility: a meta-analysis

A meta-analysis that included 8796 retrieved oocytes found no differences between conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in improving fertilization rates among women of advanced ages with non male factor infertility.

Like Comment
Related Content

Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages 354–363.e1

Authors:

Saswati Sunderam, M.A., Ph.D., Sheree L. Boulet, Dr.P.H., M.P.H., Jennifer F. Kawwass, M.D., Dmitry M. Kissin, M.D., M.P.H.

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in improving fertilization rates compared to conventional in vitro fertilization rates (IVF) among women aged ≥38 years with a non−male factor diagnosis.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting

Not applicable.

Patient(s)

Women aged ≥38 years with a non−male factor diagnosis receiving IVF or ICSI.

Intervention(s)

A systematic review of databases including PubMed and Embase was performed. Study protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Studies were selected if they compared fertilization rates from ICSI with those from conventional IVF among women aged ≥38 years with a non−male factor infertility diagnosis. A random effects model was used. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were applied.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Fertilization rate.

Results

Seven studies including 8796 retrieved oocytes (ICSI: 4,369; IVF: 4,427) with mean female age ≥38 years met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in fertilization rates between ICSI and conventional IVF (relative risk [RR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93−1.06; P = .8). Heterogeneity was observed between studies (I2 = 58.2; P < .05). Heterogeneity was significant (I2 = 57.1; P < .05) when cycles with prior fertilization failure were excluded; however, when analysis was restricted to poor responders (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97–1.05; P = .6), heterogeneity was no longer significant (I2 = 0.0; P = .5).

Conclusions

No difference was found in fertilization rates between conventional IVF and ICSI. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of ICSI in this population, controlling for other indications such as preimplantation genetic testing.


Read the full text here.

Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.

No comments yet.