Luteal phase deficiency: are we chasing a ghost?

Reflections

Like Comment
Related Content

Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages 243–244

Authors:

Terhi T. Piltonen, M.D., Ph.D.

Abstract:

Reflections on "Association between diminished ovarian reserve and luteal phase deficiency" by Pfister et al.


Read the full text here.

Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.

1 Comments

Go to the profile of Rachel Slavny
Rachel Slavny 7 months ago

Thank you for an up to date summary of the literature on LPD. Is it possible that the definition of a short LP being <11 is problematic and may be muddying the results of a lot of these studies? I wonder if any of the researchers ran separate analysis for LP's >8 days and whether this may paint a different picture? Is this possible? If implantation occurs typically between 8-10 days post ovulation the presumably a LP of under 8 may be relatively more problematic compared that is 8-11 days? Thanks for your time.