Registered reports: prospective peer review emphasizes science over spin

New News

Volume 111, Issue 5, p831-1032


Jack Wilkinson, Ph.D., Antonio Pellicer, M.D., Craig Niederberger, M.D.


Scientific studies are typically considered for publication after they are completed and the results are available. Consequently, the decision to publish is based not only on the importance of the research question and the quality of the methods used, but also on the novelty and statistical significance of the authors' findings. This in turn creates perverse incentives for researchers to seek surprising, positive results, and to prioritize creative interpretation of data over accurate discovery.

Read the full text here.

Please sign in or register for FREE

Your Fertility and Sterility Dialog login information is not the same as your ASRM or EES credentials. Users must create a separate account to comment or interact on the Dialog.