Use of testicular sperm in nonazoospermic males

Fertile Battle
Use of testicular sperm in nonazoospermic males
Like

Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages 981–987

Authors:

Akanksha Mehta, M.D., Sandro C. Esteves, M.D., Peter N. Schlegel, M.D., Craig I. Niederberger, M.D., Mark Sigman, M.D., Armand Zini, M.D., Robert E. Brannigan, M.D.

Abstract:

There is growing evidence that sperm factors can adversely affect the results of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments. Although ejaculated sperm, which have completed their transit through the male reproductive tract, may have better fertilization potential then testicular sperm, several authors have reported higher implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates with the use of testicular sperm compared to ejaculated sperm among men with male factor infertility, including men with cryptozoospermia, teratozoospermia, oligoasthenoteratozoospermia, or severe asthenozoospermia (1–5).


Read the full text here.

Which argument in this paper would you agree with?
Pros
Cons
Neither for nor against
Created with Survey Maker

Please sign in or register for FREE

Your Fertility and Sterility Dialog login information is not the same as your ASRM or EES credentials. Users must create a separate account to comment or interact on the Dialog.