Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial
Freezing all embryos allowsfor inclusion of all blastocysts in the cohort of embryos available for transfer,which also results in a higher proportion of patients reaching embryo transfer. These findings suggest a trend toward favoring the freeze-all option as a preferred transfer strategy when using known euploid embryos.
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages 723–730
Alison Coates, B.Sc., Allen Kung, B.S., Emily Mounts, M.S., John Hesla, M.D., Brandon Bankowski, M.D., Elizabeth Barbieri, M.D., Baris Ata, M.D., Jacques Cohen, Ph.D., Santiago Munné, Ph.D.
To compare two commonly used protocols (fresh vs. vitrified) used to transfer euploid blastocysts after IVF with preimplantation genetic screening.
Randomized controlled trial.
Private assisted reproduction center.
A total of 179 patients undergoing IVF treatment using preimplantation genetic screening.
Patients were randomized at the time of hCG administration to either a freeze-all cycle or a fresh day 6 ET during the stimulated cycle.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Implantation rates (sac/embryo transferred), ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs) (beyond 8 weeks), and live birth rate per ET in the primary transfer cycle.
Implantation rate per embryo transferred showed an improvement in the frozen group compared with the fresh group, but not significantly (75% vs. 67%). The ongoing PR (80% vs. 61%) and live birth rates (77% vs. 59%) were significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group.
Either treatment protocol investigated in the present study can be a reasonable option for patients. Freezing all embryos allows for inclusion of all blastocysts in the cohort of embryos available for transfer, which also results in a higher proportion of patients reaching ET. These findings suggest a trend toward favoring the freeze-all option as a preferred transfer strategy when using known euploid embryos.