Louise Lemmens, M.Sc., Snjezana Kos, Ph.D., Cornelis Beijer, M.Sc., Jacoline W. Brinkman, Ph.D., Frans A.L. van der Horst, Ph.D., Leonie van den Hoven, B.Sc., Dorit C. Kieslinger, M.Sc., Netty J. van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff, B.Sc., Albert Wolthuis, Ph.D., Jan C.M. Hendriks, Ph.D., Alex M.M. Wetzels, Ph.D. for the Semen Section of the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages 1462-1468
To investigate the value of sperm parameters to predict an ongoing pregnancy outcome in couples treated with intrauterine insemination (IUI), during a methodologically stable period of time.
Retrospective, observational study with logistic regression analyses.
A total of 1,166 couples visiting the fertility laboratory for their first IUI episode, including 4,251 IUI cycles.
Main Outcome Measure(s):
Sperm morphology, total progressively motile sperm count (TPMSC), and number of inseminated progressively motile spermatozoa (NIPMS); odds ratios (ORs) of the sperm parameters after the first IUI cycle and the first finished IUI episode; discriminatory accuracy of the multivariable model.
None of the sperm parameters was of predictive value for pregnancy after the first IUI cycle. In the first finished IUI episode, a positive relationship was found for ≤4% of morphologically normal spermatozoa (OR 1.39) and a moderate NIPMS (5–10 million; OR 1.73). Low NIPMS showed a negative relation (≤1 million; OR 0.42). The TPMSC had no predictive value. The multivariable model (i.e., sperm morphology, NIPMS, female age, male age, and the number of cycles in the episode) had a moderate discriminatory accuracy (area under the curve 0.73).
Intrauterine insemination is especially be relevant for couples with moderate male factor infertility (sperm morphology ≤4%, NIPMS 5–10 million). In the multivariable model, however, the predictive power of these sperm parameters is rather low.
Read the full text at: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(16)00097-2/fulltext