Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population Diagnostic trends among 181536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) assignment increased 7% among all Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System cycles from 2004 to 2011, despite minimal increase in patient age at cycle start. The ability of DOR assignment to predict poor ovarian response worsened.

0
0

Authors

Kate Devine, M.D., Sunni L. Mumford, Ph.D., Mae Wu, D.O., Alan H. DeCherney, M.D., Micah J. Hill, D.O., Anthony Propst, M.D.

Volume 104, Issue 3, Pages 612-619

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate trends in diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) assignment in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcomes Reporting System database and to evaluate its accuracy in predicting poor ovarian response (POR) as defined in European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology’s Bologna criteria (2011).

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

Not applicable.

Patient(s):

A total of 181,536 fresh, autologous ART cycles reported to SART by U.S. clinics in 2004 and 2011 (earliest and most recent available reporting years).

Intervention(s):

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

DOR assignment was the primary exposure. POR, defined as cycle cancellation for poor response or less than 4 oocytes retrieved after conventional gonadotropin stimulation (>149 IU FSH daily), was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were live birth and number of oocytes retrieved. DOR prevalence, power of DOR and FSH (Result(s):

DOR prevalence increased from 19% to 26% from 2004 to 2011. Among cycles clinically assigned as DOR, incidence of POR decreased from 32% to 30%, and live birth improved from 15% to 17%. Comparing basal FSH ≥12 versus clinical assignment of DOR, basal FSH had a higher specificity (92.2% vs. 81.6%) and positive predictive value (38.3% vs. 30.9%) for predicting POR. Live birth among POR cycles was 4%.

Conclusion(s):

DOR diagnosis is increasing, and accuracy remains poor, despite the availability of additional diagnostic parameters such as antral follicle count and antimüllerian hormone. POR entailed poor outcomes, but the majority of patients clinically assigned as DOR did not experience POR. Development and use of more accurate predictors of POR are needed to minimize patient distress resulting from overdiagnosis.

Read the full text at: http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)00364-7/fulltext


Go to the profile of Fertility and Sterility

Fertility and Sterility

Editorial Office, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.

No comments yet.